Starting a new business is essentially an experiment. Several hypotheses (commonly called assumptions) are implicit in the experiment and can be tested only by experience. The entrepreneur launches the enterprise and works to establish it while simultaneously validating or invalidating the assumptions. Because some will be dead wrong and others partially wrong, an essential goal of the business plan must be to continually produce and build on new knowledge. Managers must justify moving to each new stage or milestone based on information learned in the previous stage.
Learning evolutionarily is valuable not only for venture managers but also for investors, senior corporate managers, and directors. It can help them make informed decisions about funding each stage as indications of the business’s potential unfold. They can use our milestone approach to measure management performance by examining what has been learned and how effectively the venture planners have modified plans to respond to new information—rather than using projections versus performance as the measure.
Milestone planning is hardly new. However, such forethought traditionally relies on predetermined dates for reviews or project completions. The problem with date milestones is that they are unreliable for new ventures. Therefore, we suggest that managers make financing decisions instead as events are completed, using what they have just learned to make go, no-go, or redirection decisions. Obviously, new enterprises may need some deadlines and constraints. For instance, a recent proposal for a health and indoor tennis centre included a completion date allowing the club to open for the coming winter. Every milestone was linked to meeting this deadline.
For most ventures, however, significant events—not dates—should determine milestones. The only hard dates in the plan should be externally imposed, for example, by factors like contract agreements or competitive pressures.
This approach to milestone planning has three advantages for enterprises.
1. It helps avoid costly mistiming errors.
2. It gives logical and practical milestones for learning and reevaluating the venture.
3. It offers a methodology for “replanning” based on a growing body of ever-harder information.
To give an event milestone maximum learning value, the business plan must define the event’s completion so that managers can test any assumptions they make. For example, a plan would not read: “Milestone—completion of product development.” A better, more specific statement would be:
“Milestone—completion of product development. Completion of a prototype machine that costs no more than $150,000, that can be manufactured for a direct cost of $12,000, that can produce 40 widgets per minute at 30 cents per widget, that the FCC will approve, and that high school graduates can operate with three days of training.”
As planners reach each milestone, they can compare results with the detailed specifications to ascertain whether their original assumptions still hold. Then, they can use their experience to decide the next steps.
For example, suppose you are managing the project we have just described, and you learn after product development that the assumptions appear well founded, except that the direct cost will be $30,000 instead of $12,000. You know you need to find out how to change the price. Is there still a market at another price? Do you continue the project, redirect it, or abort it? How does the new target market differ from the one you originally projected? Does the prototype have any other harmful or positive features you had not anticipated? How will you go about changing your plan? What will the changes teach you?
Few entrepreneurs use such planning for their new ventures, explicitly mapping out a sequence of events. More common are the horrifying consequences of not planning thoroughly: the attendant mistimings, heightened cash-flow “burn rates,” and accumulated losses.
Obviously, all enterprises are different. While every event in a product’s history can teach something, our experience suggests several important milestones are likely the most significant. We describe them in this reading, and for each critical event, we ask appropriate questions and offer lessons based on actual cases.
This stage has a meagre cost relative to future steps and precedes complete product development; indeed, it often comes before any product development. This phase aims to determine whether to proceed with any further development. At this point, planners consider whether a real market need exists for the product as they have conceived it, the model they developed, or whether it has a potentially fatal flaw. At this milestone, entrepreneurs may have discovered a different opportunity from testing and changing their original concept.
The concept testing challenges assumptions about desired product characteristics, target markets, pricing range, and perception of need. Planners need to ask themselves the following questions:
Concept and product model testing are probably the least expensive ways of avoiding costly failure if planners link product-development decisions to results. While some actual product development, production, and test marketing may appear cheap enough to warrant eliminating this stage, it has tremendous value as a safeguard against self-delusion and as a source of alternative-opportunity identification in every situation.
For example, long before starting development work, entrepreneurs in a word processor venture in the 1970s identified highly desirable characteristics for the processor through interviews with potential users. They then examined important target markets with special programming needs in law firms and government agencies. Long before they initiated expensive microprogramming efforts, the founders radically revised the initial product concept, based on the research results, to be a software product rather than a combined hardware-software product.
Entrepreneurs can obtain a lot of useful information by carefully analyzing prototype development. They must look carefully at what caused roadblocks and disappointments and how they overcame them; the seeds of significant, hidden opportunities lie in the creative solutions to these frustrations.
For example, the software programmer in one venture to develop a specialized, interactive information retrieval service eventually had to devise some radically new programming procedures to overcome a severe data-searching bottleneck. When the entrepreneurs looked for lessons in the situation, they realized they had an essential invention on their hands and patented it. The invention’s profit potential is ten times greater than the original business’s and was developed at a fraction of the cost.
To apply lessons from prototype completion, entrepreneurs must answer the following questions:
If planners expect product development time to be lengthy, they may find it helpful to divide development activities into sub-milestones for review.
Whether the first outside financing is for seed money to test the concept’s potential, start-up financing for product development and market testing, or first-stage financing to initiate manufacturing or sales, the entrepreneur must understand how investors perceive the venture.
Businesses must compete in the capital and product markets to survive. Given the highly competitive financial market, entrepreneurs should view securing financing as an opportunity to learn about their ventures’ acceptable financial and expense structure.
For example, a publisher seeking funds for a new magazine soon learned that investors objected to her plan because she had budgeted to purchase a large piece of capital equipment. In a revised plan, she budgeted for leasing the equipment at conventional rates; again, she encountered resistance. Eventually, she persuaded a supplier to lend her the equipment for the first nine months of operations. This favourable assistance to cash-flow projections and her determination enabled her to secure the funding she needed. What was necessary in this case was that she treated each rejection as an opportunity to ask why the plan had been turned down. She learned what investors considered to be an acceptable financial structure.
Entrepreneurs should use plant tests (or pilot operations for a service venture) to challenge or change their assumptions and to produce information about the following:
Early data about these factors will improve performance and cost estimates during full-scale operations. In one case, entrepreneurs pilot-testing a new process to be licensed to manufacture a frozen food product aimed at the traditional market for such products—the food-service market—discovered that the product was physically more durable than anyone had thought it would be. By asking themselves what new opportunity this difference created, the founders identified the possibility of consumer marketing. Because the product was robust enough, they could automatically produce it in small packages and give it high product visibility—something that had never been achieved before in this product category. The planners had assumed that the new product, like the old, would be fragile and require expensive manual packaging. Company executives revised the marketing plan to include consumer and food-service marketing.
Fortunately, the executives had also decided not to enter any licensing agreements until they had learned all they could from the pilot studies. Now, they could raise projected royalties without potential clients accusing them of reneging on prior agreements.
The first genuinely demanding challenges of the venture’s basic market assumptions occur at this milestone. The questions managers ask themselves now are:
A group who had developed a new electronic device for amateur band musicians decided they could build a worthwhile small business. The first step was to produce a few hundred units for market testing. The entrepreneurs decided to make no commitment to fixed costs until they learned from market tests what volumes the product would sell. So, they subcontracted all tasks and tested the market with virtually no overhead. Test market results showed the business potential to be marginal, and the inventors dropped the project with a negligible loss.
The first successful production run tests the revised assumptions generated from pilot operations. The first runs are likely to reveal many problems that need solving. Most importantly, project planners will learn the costs of producing a steady product flow and meeting the quality requirements. Unfortunately, entrepreneurs consistently miscalculate the time this process takes and its impact on the timing of future events—especially plans for expanding the marketing effort and financing requirements.
Selling, making delivery commitments, and anticipating planned production can lead to extreme pressure to get the product out. Attempting to squeeze the product out of a plant running into start-up problems can compromise product quality and production at enormous rejection rates, giving rise to customer dissatisfaction and wasting vast amounts of resources. This vicious circle can destroy a new venture.
In the start-up of a baked-food business, a new plant scaled up from a pilot operation ran into quality problems from trying to produce too much too soon. Because the owners had already made significant delivery commitments to customers, many of whom had, in turn, employed sales forces to sell the product, the new business found itself operating at full scale with rejects at 20 times the planned level. The owners needed months to solve the problems and years to recover from the losses.
Planners can best manage production start-ups by making up a separate critical-path milestone plan for them and by providing for inventory accumulation before shipments begin.
This is the first substantial sale to an expected significant account in the industrial market. This is the first important sale to a significant distributor in the consumer business. Achieving this sale will likely give the new company a big push forward; failure to achieve it can become a stumbling block to sales growth. Entrepreneurs learn the following from this milestone.
Ideally, the bellwether sale will be to a vital prospect who has been in contact with the owners throughout the development of the new business and whose needs the owners have considered along the way. New opportunities may also present themselves.
Federal Express’s experience with IBM as an early large customer illustrates this milestone’s learning opportunities. Instead of congratulating itself on its good fortune, Federal Express investigated why IBM was a strong customer and learned that the company was using its service to reduce inventories of costly parts that IBM service bureaus held to support customer service. Federal Express then modified its marketing effort and targeted a significant portion of its promotion on the particular needs of its industrial customers rather than only promoting package delivery service. The company thus rapidly identified and secured a much larger industrial business than it had expected.
It is impossible for entrepreneurs to know in advance how competitors will respond to a new product or service. However, it is possible to plan alternative responses to possible moves and study these moves to learn rivals’ actual competitive position.
Consider the case of an instrument company that, in early 1984, developed a highly innovative microprocessor-based device. Its entire marketing campaign depended on how close a significant competitor was to producing an equivalent product. The top executives reasoned that if the competitor were near, the response to the new product would be to cut the prices of its existing products to reduce inventories. On the other hand, the competitor would probably first attempt to defend its share by increasing its sales promotion, advertising, and other marketing efforts if it were not ready with a similar new product. When the competition did not cut prices, the instrument company moved aggressively into the market, and by late 1984, it still had the market to itself.
In another instance, a leading travel wholesaler introduced a series of tours to the Middle East but hoped to discourage its most significant competitor’s standard follow-the-leader reaction. The wholesaler deliberately avoided its most considerable advertising and promotion activities until the competitor acted. The wholesaler figured that if the competitor tentatively entered the market by offering only one or two tours, that would signify only a half-hearted commitment. If it entered on a grander scale, it meant business. When the competitor offered only one tour, the wholesaler responded with a blockbuster marketing campaign, which scared the competition away.
Entrepreneurs may discover a need to redesign the product or alter the target market at any point on the milestone path. This redirection may recast prospects for the entire venture or, at the other extreme, create whole new areas of opportunity by defining follow-on product or market needs. At this point, entrepreneurs learn the differences between what they have offered and what the market needs.
The redesign or redirection decision is a time for reexamining all the basic assumptions concerning market size, segments, investment requirements, pricing, and financing (both needs and availability). A dramatic example is the design and marketing of Apple Computer’s Lisa to combat the IBM PC with enhanced features and capability. Although admired for its technical aspects, Lisa’s sales lagged, and Apple discontinued it. The company did notice, however, a potential market in the personal computer arena for many of Lisa’s features. Apple incorporated several of them into its Macintosh at a much lower price and reached a mass market.
Another case involves Thermo-Fax, which failed when 3M introduced it for researchers to copy library documents. The company redesigned the product for the office market and became highly profitable.
New venture planners must base all their pro forma activities on assumptions regarding prices, costs, and competition. Still, the actual value of a product or service is difficult to know until the company launches it in a competitive environment. Changes in competition, technology, and costs may force a considerable price revision, which, because of its direct effect on the bottom line, can make this milestone the most important in determining whether to abandon or redirect a project. Entrepreneurs need to ask themselves at this stage:
In one case, the managers of an electronics business wanted to supply digital switching gear to the telecommunications field. Still, they encountered strong price resistance from telecommunications companies when they offered the equipment for sale as a unit. The price assumptions were wrong because an insufficient incentive existed to replace the existing product. Management offered to install the equipment and charge it peruse but still had no success. Their price assumptions were still wrong because the new charge would be too high for the companies’ clients. Finally, management unbundled the services and offered standard switching at a low per-usage cost for the direct customers and specialized switching options (such as automatic disaster or other emergency signals) for the customers’ clients on a monthly rental basis. This approach succeeded.
Milestone reviews are pointless unless managers use them to make decisions. The decisions help planners determine what they can do to ensure success or reduce the cost of failure.
Each new venture has its own set of milestones. Descriptions of these critical events should include a statement of the significant questions managers must ask to test their assumptions at each stage. Such a design forces planners to learn and replan based on what they have learned. The milestone approach satisfies the need for planning and flexibility and clarifies the hazards of neglecting linkages between certain events.
Decision choices at each milestone are not limited to either pouring more money in to make the highly improbable occur or aborting the project altogether. Equally feasible possibilities include slowing down, speeding up, trying something to learn more, redirecting, changing scale, or postponing or resequencing specific actions. The point is that milestone planning takes entrepreneurs at the lowest possible cost to the next critical stage, where they can make informed decisions rather than blunder by adhering to a fixed plan out of ignorance they have based on faulty projections.
In summary, we recommend that new venture managers adopt the following procedure when developing a business plan:
1. Identify the most important events or actions that must occur to achieve your objectives.
2. Determine which events are prerequisites to others: the necessary sequential links between events.
3. Develop a critical-path milestone chart that graphically displays the sequence.
4. Identify the significant assumptions on which the venture’s success depends.
5. Ask if an event on the milestone chart will test each assumption. If not, design such a step and insert it. Specify what information will replace the assumption and how you will obtain it.
6. Review the planned future events as each occurs and replace assumptions with information. Where necessary, change their sequence and nature. Evaluate the business based on evolving projections. Do the upside gain, downside risk, and feasibility assessment still justify moving ahead?
7. Establish a review schedule that relates to event completion and time factors. Evaluate performance based on what you have learned and what you can apply.
8. Rather than argue whether results met projections, design financing rewards—and resource allocations and rewards—based on the results achieved.
Nations failing to invest in health and education are at risk of stagnating economies and lower per capita GDP, according to the first-ever scientific study ranking countries for their levels of human capital. US drops from 6th to 27th, China jumps from 69th to 44th, Turkey from 102nd to 43rd, South Korea from 18th to 6th, and Singapore from 43rd to 13th.
Whether it’s business innovation, employee engagement or everyday productivity, technology promises to do it all. But amidst the limitless possibilities, leaders can find themselves uncertain on the benefits of certain technologies, how to focus their investments and how to get their people on board with change.
Behind every major resource-allocation decision a company makes lies some calculation of what that move is worth. Whether the decision is to launch a new product, enter a strategic partnership, invest in R&D, or build a new facility, how a company estimates value is a critical determinant of how it allocates resources. And the allocation of resources, in turn, is a key driver of a company’s overall performance.
Get in touch with us or Find an office closest to you
